Skip to content

[FLINK-39210][table] Fixed Memory Leak Issue in Flink SQL with Multiple Temporal Joins#27992

Open
Au-Miner wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Au-Miner:FLINK-39210
Open

[FLINK-39210][table] Fixed Memory Leak Issue in Flink SQL with Multiple Temporal Joins#27992
Au-Miner wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Au-Miner:FLINK-39210

Conversation

@Au-Miner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

Fix Memory Leak Issue in Flink SQL with Multiple Temporal Joins.

Brief change log

  • Clean up per-key bookkeeping (nextLeftIndex, registeredTimer) when both probe and build sides are fully drained for a key, preventing unbounded state growth in jobs without idle-state retention.
  • Remove tombstoned (DELETE/UPDATE_BEFORE) versioned rows from rightState during watermark-driven cleanup, allowing the state backend to fully reclaim per-key entries for deleted versioned rows.

Verifying this change

This change is verified by new and existing tests in TemporalRowTimeJoinOperatorTest#testPerKeyStateIsCleanedUpWithoutStateRetention.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable

@flinkbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 22, 2026

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants