Skip to content

Update dependabot reviewers#272

Merged
esezen merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
noci-update-dependabot-reviewers
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

Update dependabot reviewers#272
esezen merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
noci-update-dependabot-reviewers

Conversation

@jjl014
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jjl014 jjl014 commented Apr 15, 2026

Updates:

  • Update reviewers for dependabot PRs to the mobile lib admins group rather than individuals

@jjl014 jjl014 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2026 23:35
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 15, 2026 23:35
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates Dependabot configuration so dependency update PRs are assigned to a GitHub team (mobile lib admins) instead of individual reviewers, keeping ownership consistent as personnel changes.

Changes:

  • Replace individual Dependabot reviewers with the Constructor-io/integrations-mobile-lib-swift-admins team.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@constructor-claude-bedrock constructor-claude-bedrock Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR replaces two individual GitHub usernames as dependabot reviewers with a team reference (Constructor-io/integrations-mobile-lib-swift-admins), which is a clean maintenance improvement.

Inline comments: 0 discussions added

Overall Assessment: ✅ Pass

@esezen esezen merged commit 6bd8395 into master Apr 17, 2026
7 checks passed
@esezen esezen deleted the noci-update-dependabot-reviewers branch April 17, 2026 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants